The term marketing has changed and evolved over a period of time, today marketing is based around providing continual benefits to the customer, these benefits will be provided and a transactional exchange will take place. The Chartered Institute of Marketing define marketing as 'The management process responsible for identifying, anticipating and satisfying customer requirements profitably'. Join me as we take a look at the modern approach to Marketing Management.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Geographical Pricing
Geographical Pricing is the practice of modifying a basic list price based on the geographical location of the buyer. It is intended to reflect the costs of shipping to different locations.
There are several types of geographic pricing:
•FOB origin (Free on Board origin) - The shipping cost from the factory or warehouse is paid by the purchaser. Ownership of the goods is transferred to the buyer as soon as it leaves the point of origin. It can be either the buyer or seller that arranges for the transportation.
•Uniform delivery pricing - (also called postage stamp pricing) - The same price is charged to all.
•Zone pricing - Prices increase as shipping distances increase. This is sometimes done by drawing concentric circles on a map with the plant or warehouse at the center and each circle defining the boundary of a price zone. Instead of using circles, irregularly shaped price boundaries can be drawn that reflect geography, population density, transportation infrastructure, and shipping cost. (The term "zone pricing" can also refer to the practice of setting prices that reflect local competitive conditions, i.e., the market forces of supply and demand, rather than actual cost of transportation.)
Zone pricing, as practiced in the gasoline industry in the United States, is the pricing of gasoline based on a complex and secret weighting of factors, such as the number of competing stations, number of vehicles, average traffic flow, population density, and geographic characteristics. This can result in two branded gas stations only a few miles apart selling gasoline at a price differential of as much as $0.50 per gallon.
Many businesspeople and economists state that gasoline zone pricing merely reflects the costs of doing business in a complex and volatile marketplace. Critics contend that industry monopoly and the ability to control not only industry-owned "corporate" stations, but locally owned or franchise stations, make zone pricing into an excuse to raise gasoline prices virtually at will. Oil industry representatives contend that while they set wholesale and dealer tank wagon prices, individual dealers are free to see whatever prices they wish and that this practice in itself causes widespread price variations outside industry control.
•Basing point pricing - Certain cities are designated as basing points. All goods shipped from a given basis point are charged the same amount.
•Freight-absorption pricing - The seller absorbs all or part of the cost of transportation. This amounts to a price discount, and is used as a promotional tactic
Cost-Plus Pricing
Cost-plus pricing is a strategy that is used to determine the retail and/or wholesale price of goods and services offered for consumption. Businesses of all sizes tend to use this simplistic pricing model as a guideline for arriving at sale prices that will allow the company to cover all costs associated with the production and sale of the products, and still make a reasonable profit from the effort. The basic formula for cost-plus pricing works as well for calculating pricing goods such as the cost of a meal in a café as it does for pricing services such as utilities or courier services.
The ultimate goal of cost-plus pricing is to allow the originator of a good or service to price goods and services in a manner that helps to ensure all costs associated with the effort are covered. At the same time, cost-plus pricing helps to promote the creation of a situation where the originator makes a profit and remains competitive with companies that offer similar goods and services. Fortunately, only a few simple pieces of information are required to establish a solid cost-plus pricing model for any business.
The first key component to calculating cost-plus pricing is to establish what it costs to actually produce the end product or service. This involves considering all expenses that go into the production process, such as raw materials, labor and production costs, packaging, transport, and sales and marketing expenses. By dividing the cumulative expenses associated with producing the products by the number of units produced, it is possible to arrive at what is sometimes referred to as the unit cost. The unit cost represents the minimum price that must be charged in order for the producer to recoup his or her investment into the creation of the unit.
Calculating price using the cost-plus method
There are several ways of determining cost, and the profit can be added as either a percentage markup or an absolute amount. One example is:
P = (AVC + FC%) * (1 + MK%)
Where:
P = price
AVC = average variable cost
FC% = percentage apportionment of fixed costs
MK% = percentage markup
For example: If variable costs are 30 dollars, the allocation to cover fixed costs is 10 dollars, and you feel you need a 50% markup then you would charge a price of 60 dollars:
P = (30 + 10) * (1 + 0.50)
P = 40 * 1.5
P = 60
**This equation states that 50% of the Total costs will be added on top of the total costs to get the selling price
An alternative way of doing a similar calculation is:
P = (AVC + FC%) / (1 − MK%)
** This equation states the total costs are 50% of the selling price**
These two mark up equations are slightly different, and yield different results. The first equation (40*1.5=60) The second equation (40/(1-.5)=80
If you are in the USA, it should be noted carefully that any pricing on a cost-plus contract can be audited by the government. How to do this pricing, what items can be included, and how the calculations are to be made is governed by the FAR (or Federal Acquisition Regulations). Failure to follow the precepts of FAR can lead to decreased contractor revenue or, in extreme cases, claims of penalties against the contractor under the False Claims Act and Contract Disputes Act.
To make things simpler, some firms, particularly retailers, ignore fixed costs and just use the purchase price paid to their suppliers as the cost term. They indirectly incorporate the fixed cost allocation into the markup percentage. To simplify things even further, sometimes a fixed amount is applied rather than a percentage. This fixed amount is usually determined by head-office to make it easy for franchisees and store managers. This is sometimes referred to as turnkey pricing.
Another variant of cost plus pricing is activity based pricing. This involves being more careful in determining costs. Instead of using arbitrary expense categories when allocating overhead, every activity is linked to the resources it uses.
Cost will need to be recalculated and the percentage markup wills likely need to be adjusted as the product goes through its life cycle. This is sometimes referred to as product life cycle pricing, although it is seldom done deliberately or in a planned and organized manner. Price skimming and penetration pricing are also types of product life cycle pricing but they are demand based pricing methods rather than cost based.
Advantages of Cost-Plus Pricing
1.Easy to calculate
2.Minimal information requirements
3.Easy to administer
4.Tends to stabilize markets - insulated from demand variations and competitive factors
5.Insures seller against unpredictable, or unexpected later costs
6.Ethical advantages
Disadvantages of Cost-Plus Pricing
1.Provides no incentive for efficiency
2.Tends to ignore the role of consumers
3.Tends to ignore the role of competitors
4.Use of historical accounting costs rather than replacement value
5.Use of “normal” or “standard” output level to allocate fixed costs
6.Inclusion of sunk costs rather than just using incremental costs
7.Ignores opportunity costs
8.Contractors may not focus on performance because the cost is always covered by the client
Price Elasticity of Demand
What is Price Elasticity of Demand?
•Price elasticity of demand (PED) is defined as the measure of responsiveness in the quantity demanded for a commodity as a result of change in price of the same commodity. It is a measure of how consumers react to a change in price. In other words, it is percentage change in quantity demanded by the percentage change in price of the same commodity. In economics and business studies, the price elasticity of demand is a measure of the sensitivity of quantity demanded to changes in price. It is measured as elasticity that is it measures the relationship as the ratio of percentage changes between quantity demanded of a good and changes in its price.
•Price elasticity of demand refers to the way prices change in relationship to the demand, or the way demand changes in relationship to pricing. Price elasticity can also reference the amount of money each individual consumer is willing to pay for something. People with lower incomes tend to have lower price elasticity, because they have less money to spend. A person with a higher income is thought to have higher price elasticity, since he can afford to spend more. In both cases, ability to pay is negotiated by the intrinsic value of what is being sold. If the thing being sold is in high demand, even a consumer with low price elasticity is usually willing to pay higher prices.
Elasticity implies stretch and flexibility. The flexibility or the price elasticity of demand will change based on each item. Changing nature of both price and demand are affected by a number of factors.
Generally, goods or services offered at a lower price lead to a demand for greater quantity. If you can get socks on sale you might buy several pairs or several packages, instead of just a pair. This means that though the seller offers the socks at a lower price, he usually ends up making more money, because demand for the product has increased. However if the price is set too low, the retailer may lose money by selling too many pairs of socks at a reduced rate.
Price elasticity of demand evaluates how change in price influences demand. In certain circumstances, demand remains inelastic, despite higher prices. This is true of a number of medications that are available to treat certain conditions, where there is no substitute. Demand remains constant in spite of high prices.
In simpler words, demand for a product can be said to be very inelastic if consumers will pay almost any price for the product, and very elastic if consumers will only pay a certain price, or a narrow range of prices, for the product. Inelastic demand means a producer can raise prices without much hurting demand for its product, and elastic demand means that consumers are sensitive to the price at which a product is sold and will not buy it if the price rises by what they consider too much.
Drinking water is a good example of a good that has inelastic characteristics in that people will pay anything for it (high or low prices with relatively equivalent quantity demanded), so it is not elastic. On the other hand, demand for sugar is very elastic because as the price of sugar increases, there are many substitutions which consumers may switch to.
A price fall usually results in an increase in the quantity demanded by consumers. The demand for a good is relatively inelastic when the change in quantity demanded is less than change in price. Goods and services for which no substitutes exist are generally inelastic. Demand for an antibiotic, for example, becomes highly inelastic when it alone can kill an infection resistant to all other antibiotics. Rather than die of an infection, patients will generally be willing to pay whatever is necessary to acquire enough of the antibiotic to kill the infection.
Various research methods are used to calculate price elasticity:
Test markets
Analysis of historical sales data
Conjoint analysis
Price Elasticity of Demand
Elasticity of demand (Ped) = % change in demand of good X / % change in price of good X
•If the PED is greater than one, the good is price elastic. Demand is responsive to a change in price. If for example a 15% fall in price leads to a 30% increase in quantity demanded, the price elasticity = 2.0
•If the PED is less than one, the good is inelastic. Demand is not very responsive to changes in price. If for example a 20% increase in price leads to a 5% fall in quantity demanded, the price elasticity = 0.25
•If the PED is equal to one, the good has unit elasticity. The percentage change in quantity demanded is equal to the percentage change in price. Demand changes proportionately to a price change.
•If the PED is equal to zero, the good is perfectly inelastic. A change in price will have no influence on quantity demanded. The demand curve for such a product will be vertical.
•If the PED is infinity, the good is perfectly elastic. Any change in price will see quantity demanded fall to zero. This demand curve is associated with firms operating in perfectly competitive markets
Factors that determine the value of price elasticity of demand
1. Number of close substitutes within the market - The more (and closer) substitutes available in the market the more elastic demand will be in response to a change in price. In this case, the substitution effect will be quite strong.
2. Luxuries and necessities - Necessities tend to have a more inelastic demand curve, whereas luxury goods and services tend to be more elastic. For example, the demand for opera tickets is more elastic than the demand for urban rail travel. The demand for vacation air travel is more elastic than the demand for business air travel.
3. Percentage of income spent on a good - It may be the case that the smaller the proportion of income spent taken up with purchasing the good or service the more inelastic demand will be.
4. Habit forming goods - Goods such as cigarettes and drugs tend to be inelastic in demand. Preferences are such that habitual consumers of certain products become de-sensitised to price changes.
5. Time period under consideration - Demand tends to be more elastic in the long run rather than in the short run. For example, after the two world oil price shocks of the 1970s - the "response" to higher oil prices was modest in the immediate period after price increases, but as time passed, people found ways to consume less petroleum and other oil products. This included measures to get better mileage from their cars; higher spending on insulation in homes and car pooling for commuters. The demand for oil became more elastic in the long-run
Mathematical Definition
The formula used to calculate coefficients of price elasticity of demand for a given product is
Conventions differ regarding the minus sign, considering remarks like "price elasticity of demand is usually negative". (The sign of the coefficient should actually be determined by the directions in which price and quantity change; i.e. if the price increases by 5% and quantity demanded decreases by 5%, then the elasticity at the initial price and quantity = −5%/5% = −1. Note, however, that many economists will refer to price-elasticity of demand as a positive value although it is generally negative due to the negative relationship between price and quantity demanded.)
This simple formula has a problem, however. It yields different values for Ed depending on whether Qd and Pd are the original or final values for quantity and price. This formula is usually valid either way as long as you are consistent and choose only original values or only final values. (note that a percentage change is always calculated with the initial value in the denominator; if you are to use your final value in the denominator then you must treat that value as the initial value in the numerator. i.e. if price increases from $5 to $10, then the percentage increase is calculated as: ((10 − 5)/5)*100 = 100%. If price decreases from 10 to 5, the percent decrease = ((5 − 10)/10))*100 = −50%. If you throw 10 into the denominator without switching the terms in the numerator your product's price will appear to increase by 50% which is simply not true.)
Or, using the differential calculus form:
This can be rewritten in the form:
On the graduate level, Mas-Colell, Winston, and Green (1995) defines elasticity of demand with respect to price as follows. Let be the demand of goods as a function of parameters price and wealth, and let be the demand for good . The elasticity of demand with respect to price pk is
Point-price elasticity
Point Elasticity = (% change in Quantity) / (% change in Price)
Point Elasticity = (∆Q/Q)/(∆P/P)
Point Elasticity = (P ∆Q) / (Q ∆P)
Point Elasticity = (P/Q)(∆Q/∆P) Note: In the limit (or "at the margin"), "(∆Q/∆P)" is the derivative of the demand function with respect to P. "Q" means 'Quantity' and "P" means 'Price'.
Example
Suppose a certain good (say, laserjet printers) has a demand curve Q = 1,000 − 0.6P. We wish to determine the point-price elasticity of demand at P = 80 and P = 40. First, we take the derivative of the demand function Q with respect to P:
Next we apply the equation for point-price elasticity, namely
to the ordered pairs (40, 976) and (80, 952). We have
at P=40, point-price elasticity e = −0.6(40/976) = −0.02.
at P=80, point-price elasticity e = −0.6(80/952) = −0.05.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)